A Lamentable Day For Scottish Democracy

The Scottish Parliament has had its high points and its low points but the past couple of days has witnessed as woeful a low as I can remember. Scotland’s mainstream political parties appear to value petty point-scoring about who said what when rather than get to grips with the issues at hand.

Yesterday, Michael McMahon lobbed an insult at the Presiding Officer leading to his suspension from Parliament today (see extract above).

Today, First Ministers’ Questions had more in common with a school playground than a Parliament. It was a lamentable and infantile occasion with a lot of shouting and arguing about numbers.

And, as if to underline the extent to which Scotland’s main political parties have become infantilised, they each produced their own press releases accusing each of other of lying and misleading Parliament.

It is not simply the childish behaviour on display. A particular low point for me was something upon which probably no-one took issue. In answer to Johann Lamont’s opening question at First Minister’s Questions today, Alex Salmond responded by beginning with a warning about the impact the weather was having on Scotland.

Now the weather is important but the fact that the First Minister chose to make these remarks illustrates the extent to which the Parliament and the Scottish Government have co-opted virtually every issue as a national issue.

Planning for, and responding to, extreme weather events is primarily a responsibility of Scotland’s local authorities and emergency services. The Scottish Government and its agencies have a role to play in providing support and backup. It may not be a very good example but it follows on from questions to the First Minister such as whether some patients in a hospital had blankets or not. In short, government in Scotland has been hollowed out and responses, accountability and questions which should be directed at local government are now seen as legitimate causes for political debate at Holyrood.

In an excellent House of Commons Communities and Local Government Committee report in 2009 (and I cite this since, although it applies to England, it is the kind of inquiry the Scottish Parliament has yet to properly conduct), the Committee recommends that,

137. The manner in which Parliament debates some essentially local issues can work to constrain local government. In England, local government’s alleged failings quickly get elevated to the level of national debate on the floor of the House, as recently seen with regard to child protection issues—the Baby P case—and preparation for heavy snowfall. The effect of repeated parliamentary interventions is to encourage the public and media to look to central government to solve local problems, and to prompt central government to act. To help achieve the benefits described by Professor Tony Travers, Parliament may need to curb some of its own interventionist instincts. We were told by local politicians during our trip to Denmark and Sweden that, having agreed the overall framework and guidelines, each country’s Parliament kept out of local government affairs. Whilst we fully accept that MPs have an obligation to raise issues that matter in their constituency, it may be that they need to set themselves a higher threshold before raising and debating essentially local matters in the Chamber of the House.

Earlier today, I watched the City of Edinburgh Council meeting which is now webcast. It was its heated moments but on the whole the debate was informative, measured and reasoned.

I really don’t know how the Parliament has sunk so low. I guess the purpose of this blog is simply to note the fact that it has and to highlight once again the fact that governance in Scotland remains a weakened and shallow affair.

Andy Wightman
Writer, researcher, analyst, commentator and activist

Print Friendly

There are 2 comments

  1. Peter Thomson

    You should ask Johann Lamont why she thinks lying to the Scottish Parliament is the way to hold the SNP to account? Once you get an answer to that (it is New Labour Policy to play the man not the ball) you may begin to fathom why the level of debate is so ineffectual. The First Minister can only respond to the ‘questions’ put by the opposition.

    Here’s how it has been going for months – I paraphrase:

    Lamont – Wee Eck you are a liar, liar pants on fire poltician and see here’s another made up story to prove it – pick anyone of NHS Blankets, legal advice on the EU etcetera.

    Wee Eck – Wait a minute that happened on your watch what is actually happening is …

    Lamont – I say again to the first minister he is a liar and a false prophet of Belzebub

    Wee Eck – So far of six accusations of me lying to parliament raised by her party five have been rejected … could she ask me a proper question rather than making unfounded assertions ….

    Lamont – There you go again trying to avoid my point that you are a liar …. and out to turn Scotland into a wasteland …

    That is why it is a waste of energy watching FMQ’s because rarely is the FM asked any substantive question by the opposition – Ruth is no better – it is simply a chance for Labour to throw as much muck as they can in the hope some of it will stick. While avoiding the impact on Scotland of policies from Westminster which cause damage to us as a people.

    Many folk now watch FMQ’s for its slap about humour and to hear and see what total bilge London have told Lamont to say this week. if you want to hear sensible discussion you are better watching the live Scottish Parliamentary committees.

  2. Doug Daniel

    It’s absolutely dire. For what it’s worth, I think this is the inevitable consequence of devolution – we have a national parliament seeking things to do, so without things like foreign policy, defence and immigration to shout at each other about, they end up getting into rammies over things that should not be of their concern.

    In fairness, the targeting of Stewart Stevenson made weather a national issue – getting someone to resign because of bad snow remains one of the most ridiculous moments in Scottish politics – although it turned out to be quite fortunate because Keith Brown is better anyway. But aye, things like schools, hospitals and roads – these should be local issues. As a result, councils are left as little more than administrations. Then again, trunk roads like the M8 pass through multiple council areas, so it’s a bit of a grey area…

    I can’t see it getting any better this side of independence. As long as opposition parties and the media are going to criticise the government for what should really be local issues, they’re going to continue to want control over them. You can just imagine the headlines if the Health Minister said “talk to your council about problems in your hospitals, nae me…” And the discussion on Twitter today between you, Lesley Riddoch and Angus MacNeil was most telling…

Post Your Thoughts