[box bg="#eeeeee" color-"#666666"]Collective Thinking is our exclusive series of monthly Guest Editorials by a selection of our favourite figures from the independence movement.
Ruth Wishart is a respected journalist, writer and broadcaster.[/box]
As the 500 days till D day passed, many of us have been taking stock of the most important vote Scotland will face in our lifetimes.
For the chronologically gifted among us this will be the third major referendum in which we have had a chance to shape Scotland’s future.
In the late seventies we could only manage a whispered yes to a shilpit wee Assembly, but even that was torpedoed by a cynical manipulation of the rules by a London based Scottish MP. Plus ca change! The forty per cent rule put any ambitions to even modest self determination on the back burner for another 20 long years.
Then came 1999 and all that, and the opening of Holyrood. A day marked by fine speeches, high hopes, and, for a while at least, a moderation in knee jerk cross party hostilities.
All of which has brought us to these crossroads at which there is undoubtedly dirty work afoot. Several recent incidents have persuaded me of the urgency of upping our game if we are to prevent the road to September 2014 being cluttered with petty bickering, character assassination, and internecine squabbles.
All of my adult life, it seems the energies of many left of centre, liberal minded Scots have been squandered in party political warfare.
Just forgiveable, perhaps if the parties involved had a profound ideological divide. There are elements in Scottish Labour and the Scottish National Party who would sell their granny before conceding that they might have anything in common. Like agreeing about a whole raft of issues around social policy and defence.
What a criminal waste of time and talents.
But now we do have a real divide. Not, as some would have you believe between the parties, but between those energised by the thought of creating a more equitable communitarian society in a modern independent Scotland, and those determined to hang on to their status as junior UK partner no matter who is at the helm of HMS Great Britain, or in which alarming direction they are steering it.
This is not about party politics for me. Nor should it be for anyone voting YES. This is about the shape of Scotland to come, about the land we want to leave our children, about its values and priorities.
It is not given to many generations to have that priceless opportunity to rebuild the foundations of a reborn nation state. It should be a moment characterised by an adult debate, mutual respect, and an honest weighing of disparate opinions.
Instead we risk slipping into an unsavoury form of verbal mud wrestling with claim and counter claim as to who is threatening or trashing whom. We need to raise our eyes from that pettiness; we need to be able to say that whatever happens in 2014 Scotland was grown up enough to have a serious and tolerant conversation with itself. And the footsoldiers in party uniforms have to remind themselves that this a battle of ideas not a war of personal attrition.
In fact, neither a battle nor a war but a moment of crucial self and national reflection.
One of the most unsettling things I watched of late was the respected, intellectually gifted journalist Isobel Fraser being the subject of ignorant attempted bullying by a member of the Scottish tribe at Westminster with something of a track record in that activity. Another was the sly slighting of Mary Lockhart, erstwhile chair of the Co-operative Party, after she confessed in a thoughtful article that, after much soul searching, she had concluded she must vote Yes.
I do not suggest for a moment that all reprehensible behaviour in this national debate comes from one camp. People of all persuasions are capable of opening their laptops before their brain is engaged. But there is a huge imbalance at the moment in the way in which the referendum campaigns are being reported. The daily scare stories orchestrated by Whitehall and dutifully recycled in Scotland might be risible, but doubtless the hope is that they will sow enough doubts and fears to win the day.
And what a hollow victory that would be. Scotland the feart, cowering under a blanket of indecision when the call came to vote for a positive future.
This last weekend the Sunday Herald broke free of that negativity to bring us news of a new study suggesting how Scotland might re-configure itself on the Nordic model rather than continue to be dragged rightwards by Westminster and UKIP.
The Common Weal is a vision of the Scotland we might yet be.
And, boy, do we need some visionaries.
Journalist, Writer and Broadcaster